Re: Re: Re: Parasound JC1 initial impressions

Posted by rcrump on September 23, 2002 at 03:04:56:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Parasound JC1 initial impressions posted by Terry Koehn on September 23, 2002 at 00:07:11:

Fathom a XLR connector, three 2" pieces of Vampire CCC wire, a switch and the fet circuit on the - side......Same circuit as on the + side, discrete fets.....Driven from a fully balanced preamp there will be 6dB more gain and about 1/10th the distortion using the preamp we built for Brian....I wish you would design an amplifier and perhaps we can find something seriously wrong with your design without even seeing the schematic.....

Follow Ups:

• Schematic of Parasound JC1 initial impressions - Terry Koehn 19:50:58 09/23/02 (8)
  • Re: Schematic of Parasound JC1 initial impressions - rcrump 20:36:49 09/23/02 (7)
    • Buyer Warning NO Schematic, No Spec.of Parasound JC1 - Terry Koehn 00:04:03 09/24/02 (6)
      • If there were ever a reason for moderating this site, - Brian Walsh 10:04:27 09/24/02 (1)
        • Parasound JCI"cause you're asking for it, buddy!" - Terry Koehn 11:20:06 09/24/02 (0)
      • My partner, John Curl, does not publish schematics - rcrump 06:38:38 09/24/02 (0)
      • Re: Buyer Warning NO Schematic, No Spec.of Parasound JC1 - fcrowder 05:54:02 09/24/02 (2)
        • Parasound JC1 Whinnying about questions..??? - Terry Koehn 11:52:11 09/24/02 (1)
          • Terry, for the last time - rcrump 12:14:38 09/24/02 (0)
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Parasound JC1 initial impressions - Terry Koehn 11:25:16 09/23/02 (3)
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Parasound JC1 initial impressions - Brian Walsh 12:55:24 09/23/02 (2)
    • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Parasound JC1 initial impressions - Terry Koehn 18:35:41 09/23/02 (1)
      • Go away and read Horowitz and Hill The Art of - rcrump 19:10:03 09/23/02 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:

Optional Link URL : 
Link Title        : 
Optional Image URL: