- This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Hello SL lovers,
Have any of you owned both Pristine and Dynastat model ? If so, can you please compare these two nice big babies please ? My room is 5,5m x 3,7m. I already own Dynastat. I have spotted a pair of Pristine on second hand market, so I wonder if Pristine may be any better (or worst) compared to Dynastat. I live in Paris, Soundlab speakers are pretty rare here. Thanks for your toughts. -
-
-
Hello Chungjh:
Sorry for the delay in response.
After the break in, yes, there is a clearly more bass as expected with double the bass panel area. With the PX/BF, the whole spectrum is improved and envelopes the room( ie. right sized for this speaker in my environment) No reduction is HF either. The imaging with the BF is improved. The whole experience has motivated me to challenge the positioning of the speaker. I now have a more acute toe-in, and with the original Pristine 2 frame at a rack angle of about 3 degrees backwards, I have slowly elevated the rear to about a 1 percent rake. Combined with the toe in and the the midrange set to + 3db, the whole system has launched up big time. Very satisfying! I have a home made sallies in the rear, angled to the rake, 5’ high as well. All combined, it snaps up the front projection nicely and reduces the backwave.
Other improvements include a fixed resistor over on the tweeter pot which resulted in a surprisingly improvement is HF smoothness and imaging.
Let us know how you make out…
Ken
-
Hello Chungjh:
Sorry for the delay in response.
After the break in, yes, there is a clearly more bass as expected with double the bass panel area. With the PX/BF, the whole spectrum is improved and envelopes the room( ie. right sized for this speaker in my environment) No reduction is HF either. The imaging with the BF is improved. The whole experience has motivated me to challenge the positioning of the speaker. I now have a more acute toe-in, and with the original Pristine 2 frame at a rack angle of about 3 degrees backwards, I have slowly elevated the rear to about a 1 percent rake. Combined with the toe in and the the midrange set to + 3db, the whole system has launched up big time. Very satisfying! I have a home made sallies in the rear, angled to the rake, 5’ high as well. All combined, it snaps up the front projection nicely and reduces the backwave.
Other improvements include a fixed resistor over on the tweeter pot which resulted in a surprisingly improvement is HF smoothness and imaging.
As for the amp, I am using VTL 225T mono blocks, heavily modified and update, with Winged C El34, 12au7 Brimar NOS and and sylvania black plate 6350. The 12au7 is not standard, and was modified to this tube along with other updates. All caps and resistors upgraded. Output is about 110 watts in a 8 ohm load( form the standard 5 ohm) and hard wired in triode mode. Lots of drive for the pristine 2 with a Toroid 1 update.
Let us know how you make out….
Ken
-
-
Yes, I have the original panels in storage. One is perfect, the other has a repair to the insulator and a punched diaphragm, but, it still works…
The Toroid 1 install was a separate Initiative. I sent the backplates back to the factory for install and a some cross over updates.
The New BF panels were a special order to fit my metal stands. I am also in Canada, so added shipping was involved. Roger was particularly helpful and accommodating throughout the the process. You should contact him directly for costs, panel dimensions and shipping. I will say that the costs are less than a heavily discounted new pair of 545s. So if the Pristine size matches your room volume (around 2400 cubic feet if I recall), than this is an option, IMO. The new panels are much heavier than my original panels.
Ken
-
-
-
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.